The way a person perceives, judges and acts in the social world through internalized, durable dispositions, habits and skills acquired over a lifetime, especially in childhood, which incline a person to act, largely without conscious calculation, in ways that tend to reproduce the social conditions that produced them.
Facts
Disputed
Core ClaimBourdieu intended habitus as a hinge between individual agency and social structure, letting a person navigate and resolve everyday situations through intuition and gut feeling rather than conscious rule-following; critics counter that the concept is deterministic, reducing social actors to something close to automata executing dispositions laid down early in life, comparable to the pre-established harmony of Leibniz's Monadology rather than to genuine choice. 1 Sourced to the subject's own accountDebated rather than attested: the secondary literature this atlas cites states the determinism critique without naming which scholars raised it, so it is recorded here as a live, real critique in the field rather than attributed to a specific dissenting author; see the open question minted alongside this entity in 04_openquestion_dissent.sql. Origin YearSourced to the subject's own account1967 is when Bourdieu reintroduced habitus and made it a cornerstone of his sociology; the term itself has older roots (Aristotle's hexis, Aquinas's habitus) that Bourdieu adapted rather than coined outright. Cross-Tradition Connections
Associated With
Both are Bourdieu concepts describing how social advantage becomes embodied and reproduced across generations.
Developed By
Sources
1. Wikipedia: Habitus (Sociology)
WikipediaOpening definition, descriptionQuote, Opening definition, description
In sociology, habitus is the way that people perceive and respond to the social world they inhabit, by way of their personal habits, skills, and disposition of character.
1. Wikipedia: Habitus (Sociology)
WikipediaCriticism section, determinism critiqueQuote, Criticism section, determinism critique
The habitus is criticised as being a deterministic concept, because, as social actors, people behave as automata, in the sense proposed in the Monadology of the philosopher G.W. Leibniz.
1. Wikipedia: Habitus (Sociology)
WikipediaBourdieu section, origin yearQuote, Bourdieu section, origin year
Pierre Bourdieu reintroduced habitus as a cornerstone of his sociology in 1967, using it to address the relationship between individual agency and social structure.
1. Wikipedia: Habitus (Sociology)
Open Questions (1 open question)
Does Pierre Bourdieu's concept of habitus leave genuine room for individual agency and social change, or does it describe social reproduction so deterministically that actors become little more than automata executing internalized dispositions?
Bourdieu developed habitus to bridge the sociological divide between structure and agency, treating it as a set of durable but not immutable dispositions a person draws on through intuition rather than conscious rule-following. Critics counter that the concept slides back into determinism: the secondary literature states plainly that habitus is criticised as a deterministic concept, comparing the social actor to an automaton in the sense of Leibniz's Monadology, where every apparent choice was in fact pre-established. Neither the determinism critique nor a name for the critic making it is given in the sources this wave read, so the dispute is recorded as live in the field rather than resolved either way.
What would resolve this A settled theoretical account, accepted across the discipline, of exactly how much a habitus can be modified by a single agent's own reflective action within one lifetime (Bourdieu's own notion of hysteresis, a habitus lagging behind changed conditions, is one candidate mechanism), as opposed to only shifting gradually across generations through changed conditions of upbringing.
Sociological theory, specifically the structure-and-agency debateWikipedia: Habitus (Sociology)
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.
View At A Past Year
The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.