Group cohesiveness is the degree to which the members of a social group feel bound to one another and to the group as a whole, a concept researchers typically break into four linked parts: social relations among members, task relations built around shared work, a felt sense of group unity, and the emotions members associate with belonging to the group. Most accounts treat cohesion as a blend of commitment to the group's task and genuine interpersonal attraction among its members, and researchers describe it as multidimensional, changing over time, driven by the practical purposes the group serves, and emotionally rewarding in its own right. A key theoretical distinction separates ordinary personal liking from social attraction, warmth felt toward another member specifically because they seem to typify the group, rather than for their own individual qualities. Cohesion tends to rise when members share similar backgrounds, attitudes and values, when the group stays relatively small, when entry is difficult enough to make membership feel like an achievement, and when the group succeeds or faces outside competition, and it shapes outcomes across sports teams, military units, workplaces and fraternal organizations, improving motivation, performance, satisfaction and emotional adjustment, while also raising the risk of excessive conformity and groupthink.
Facts
Partially Attested
Origin YearDated by the early experimental cohesion research of Festinger and colleagues in 1950; the everyday concept of group cohesion is older and has no single founding year. Core ClaimThe tendency for a group to be in unity while working towards a goal or to satisfy the emotional needs of its members. 1 Sources
1. Group cohesiveness (Wikipedia)
Definition section
Cohesion can be more specifically defined as the tendency for a group to be in unity while working towards a goal or to satisfy the emotional needs of its members.
Attraction section
Festinger and his colleagues in 1950 focused on attraction as a force in comparison to any other forces.
View the SourceReader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.