An anthropology study reference summarizing the ethical controversies in Bronislaw Malinowski's applied, policy-facing anthropology, including his support for British "indirect rule" and Diane Lewis's critique that anthropologists risked becoming tools of colonial policy.
Facts
Assessment
Reliability Tier3
Tier 3 (secondary reference): an educational anthropology study reference summarizing named scholars' published critiques; used here only for the colonial-context debate, not for contested factual claims about Evans-Pritchard specifically, whom it does not mention. Citation
PublisherBA Notes
URLhttps://banotes.org/applied-anthropology/ethical-controversies-malinowski-anthropology/
Source TypeEducational Website
Sources
BA Notes: Ethical Controversies in Malinowski's Applied Anthropology
BA NotesSection: Policy advising and indirect rule
the practical anthropologist must be the educator, at times the advocate of the natives...but he can never work against the firm principles of ordered European control.
Article, self-citation: publisher
Ethical Controversies in Malinowski's Applied Anthropology: Culture Change and Colonial Contact.
View the Source Claims Backed By This Source (14 claims)
This source backs 14 claims across the atlas. As facts: 11 well-attested. As cited relationships: 1 connected. Plus 2 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.
Disposition By Topic
- Open Questions, 8 claims: 6 well-attested, 1 connected, 1 general references.
- Sources, 5 claims: 5 well-attested.
- Social Theorists, 1 claims: 1 general references.
Reader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.