Nancy C. M. Hartsock was an American social sciences scholar, born in 1943, who was a professor of Political Science and Women Studies at the University of Washington from 1984 to 2009. She died in 2015. This description is adapted from Wikipedia contributors under CC BY-SA 4.0; changes were made. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/
Facts
Connections
Associated With
Source Nancy Hartsock (Wikipedia)
Source Nancy Hartsock (Wikipedia)
Shaped By
Source Nancy Hartsock (Wikipedia)
Source Nancy Hartsock (Wikipedia)
In the Other Atlases
Nationality
Also in Geography Atlas: the nationality of this subject.
Sources
1. Wikidata: Nancy Hartsock
- Wikidata Q12811081, class allow-list match, case-insensitive label variant (w-bbfill-smallsix2-0926/resolve_ci.ps1)
- Wikidata Q12811081, P569 (w-bbfill-smallsix3-0926)
View the Source2. Nancy Hartsock (Wikipedia)
Wikimedia FoundationLead section
Nancy C. M. Hartsock (1943-2015) was a professor of Political Science and Women Studies at the University of Washington from 1984 to 2009.
Article text, subfield gender
== Career == Hartsock was a feminist philosopher.
Article text, subfield political-theory
Her standpoint theory derived from Marxism, which claims that the proletariat has a distinctive perspective on social relations and that only this perspective reveals the truth.
Associated With: University of Chicago, Article text
After finishing college, Hartsock went to get her master's degree from the University of Chicago.
Associated With: University of Michigan, Article text
Hartsock taught in the Political Science Department of the University of Michigan.
Shaped By: Feminist Theory, Article text, Feminist Theory
== Career == Hartsock was a feminist philosopher.
Shaped By: Classical Marxism, Article text, Classical Marxism
Her standpoint theory derived from Marxism, which claims that the proletariat has a distinctive perspective on social relations and that only this perspective reveals the truth.
View the Source Reader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.