Society and Culture Atlas

How People Live Together
Open Questions

Is the nuclear family the universal or original human family form, as much mid-twentieth-century family sociology assumed, or is the extended family the more common arrangement historically and cross-culturally?

Citation Formats

General Reference

APA Style

BibTeX

Open Question

George Murdock's mid-twentieth-century comparative study of 250 societies found some form meeting his definition of family in every one, and historians Alan Macfarlane and Peter Laslett argue the nuclear household was already primary in England from at least the thirteenth century, evidence often read as supporting the nuclear family as a basic or even universal unit. Against this, the source itself states that some sociologists and anthropologists consider the extended family, not the nuclear family, to be the most common family structure in most cultures and at most times for humans, and a 4,600-year-old German burial site, sometimes cited as the earliest known nuclear-family unit, is explicitly cautioned against being read as establishing the nuclear family as a universal or the most ancient institution.

What would resolve this A cross-cultural comparative standard for what counts as the "basic" family unit (the smallest reliably present grouping versus the most common lived arrangement) precise enough that the Murdock-style universality claim and the extended-family-primacy claim are answering the same question rather than different ones.
OpenComparative family sociology and kinship anthropologyWikipedia: Nuclear Family
Cross-Tradition Connections

Question On

Sources
Wikipedia: Nuclear Family
WikipediaHistory section, universality debateView the Source
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.

View At A Past Year

The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.